Privateness and surveillance
Marko Milanovic examines The European Courtroom of Human Rights (ECtHR) Chamber’s ruling in Wieder and Guarnieri v. the UK that the interception and processing of information by a state’s intelligence companies by itself territory falls throughout the jurisdictional scope of the European Conference on Human Rights, even when the people affected by the surveillance are positioned outdoors the state’s territory. Milanovic finds that this determination broadens the appliance of human rights regulation to cowl actions of European intelligence companies involving the acquisition or processing of information affecting people’ privateness rights, no matter their bodily location, and establishes a precedent for the extraterritorial software of privateness rights within the context of digital surveillance. See the total evaluation right here.
Rudraksh Lakra examines the ECtHR current verdict within the case of Podchasov v. Russia, regarding a statute that established an information retention scheme and permitted regulation enforcement to order the decryption of information protected by end-to-end encryption. The Courtroom dominated that mandating the decryption of end-to-end encryption knowledge violated Article 8 of the European Conference on Human Rights, safeguarding the precise to privateness. The writer conteds that this determination underscores the significance of encryption in defending basic rights within the digital age and units a big precedent for future instances involving the steadiness between privateness and regulation enforcement pursuits. Learn the total submit right here.
Worldwide Courtroom of Justice (ICJ)
Matei Alexianu explores the opportunity of implementing ICJ provisional measures by means of third-party countermeasures, significantly in instances of non-compliance. The writer finds that third-party countermeasures may very well be a viable possibility, that challenges the prevailing view that solely events to an ICJ case can deploy countermeasures. Alexianu examines the authorized justifications for third-party enforcement, contemplating each erga omnes standing and the precise to help in implementing judicial choices, and descriptions the scope and necessities of such provisional countermeasures beneath customary worldwide regulation. See the total submit right here.
Dai Tamada discusses the ICJ’s method to provisional measures and preliminary objections in lght of the choices within the Ukraine v. Russia dispute relating to allegations of genocide. The writer analyzes the discrepancy between the ICJ’s Provisional Measures Order and Preliminary Objections Judgment, and examines whether or not the Provisional Measures Order stays in power regardless of the Preliminary Objections Judgment denying jurisdiction on sure features of the dispute. Tamada contends that provisional measures can have impartial obligations from substantive regulation, permitting them to stay in power even when the Courtroom denies jurisdiction or finds no violation of substantive regulation. The writer concludes that the obligations positioned by the provisional measures are impartial of the substantive obligations imposed on Russia by the Genocide Conference and, subsequently, stay legally binding. Learn the total submit right here.
John B. Quigley explores the authorized requirements regarding genocidal intent. Discussing the problem of intent in South Africa’s case in opposition to Israel on the subject of the state of affairs in Gaza. The writer examines the idea of “double intent” required for genocide, the place not solely the prohibited acts but in addition the intent to destroy a gaggle, in entire or partially, have to be established. It contrasts the conditions in Gaza and Bosnia, highlighting the distinctive circumstances in Gaza. Total, the writer presents South Africa’s claims in opposition to Israel as a novel “circumstances of life” state of affairs that the ICJ has not beforehand encountered. Learn the total submit right here.
Diane Desierto delves into the ICJ’s judgments within the instances involving Ukraine v. Russian Federation in 2024, the primary on violations of worldwide conventions relating to terrorism financing and racial discrimination, and the opposite on preliminary objections relating to allegations of genocide. The writer highlights the courtroom’s fact-finding methodologies, its restraint in offering cures for breaches of worldwide human rights regulation, and its dealing with of Ukraine’s arguments. The textual content raises considerations concerning the effectiveness of the ICJ in delivering human rights outcomes and expresses skepticism concerning the courtroom’s potential to offer satisfactory cures for human rights violations in inter-State disputes. Learn the total submit right here.
Juliette McIntyre undertakes an examination of the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice’s current modifications to its Guidelines of Courtroom. McIntyre gives a abstract of the modifications and displays on their potential outcomes. The writer concludes that:
Procedural modifications, whereas on the floor technical or just sensible, can embed specific worth decisions or have flow-on results that aren’t at all times clear. Even the seemingly mundane modification of a handful of Guidelines must be seen as a chance for ongoing discourse concerning the features and limits of the Courtroom.
Learn the total submit right here.
Marco Longobardo explores the character of the ‘obligation to make sure respect’ for worldwide humanitarian regulation (IHL) embodied in Widespread Article 1 of the 4 Geneva Conventions and in different IHL provisions. Longobardo focuses on adverse obligations beneath this obligation, which was just lately invoked by Nicaragua in its software in opposition to Germany earlier than the ICJ. The writer argues that the ascertainment of the duty of the Respondent State earlier than a reliable courtroom will not be precluded beneath the Financial Gold Precept by the dearth of consent of the Third State. Learn the total submit right here.
Worldwide Felony Regulation
Claus Kreß supplies an evaluation of Germany’s evolving stance on useful immunity throughout the realm of worldwide legal regulation, highlighting each its historic context and up to date developments. The writer traces Germany’s historic trajectory from preliminary reluctance to embracing the Nuremberg legacy to changing into a staunch supporter of worldwide legal regulation, exemplified by the adoption of the German Code of Crimes In opposition to Worldwide Regulation in 2002. Nonetheless, Kreß considers that current judicial and governmental actions reveal a extra nuanced method, with Germany’s Federal Courtroom of Justice asserting the inapplicability of useful immunity in sure instances, whereas the federal government’s place seems extra cautious, maybe influenced by political concerns. See the total submit right here.
Anni Pues discusses the current conviction of Salih Mustafa by the Appeals Panel on the Kosovo Specialist Chambers (KSC). Salih Mustafa, a particular unit (BIA) commander within the Kosovo Liberation Military throughout the Kosovo battle had been convicted for the battle crimes of homicide, torture and arbitrary detention. The writer highlights three important features of this case: the case’s contribution to creating battle crimes jurisprudence, the bounds on judicial discretion in sentencing, and the unprecedented excessive particular person reparations awards and the institution of a ‘post-trial decide’ to make sure enforcement of those reparations’ awards. Learn the total submit right here.
Extra posts
M. E. Salamanca-Aguado discusses the authorized implications surrounding the expiration of the two-year interval for elaborating rules on the exploitation of mineral assets within the Space ruled by the Worldwide Seabed Authority (ISA). The writer highlights the interpretation of subparagraph (c) along side Half XI of the Settlement, the authorized standing of the Space and its assets, and the challenges in adopting guidelines, rules, and procedures for exploitation. Moreover, he touches upon the provisional approval of pending exploitation plans and the potential jurisdiction of the Seabed Disputes Chamber over disputes arising from such approvals. Learn the total submit right here.
Leonie Brassat explores the lawfulness of navy strikes in opposition to the Houthis in Yemen and the Purple Sea in response to Houthi assaults on business and service provider vessels within the Purple Sea. Brassat examines the legality of those strikes beneath worldwide regulation and argues that UNSC Decision 2722(2024) can not justify the navy strikes, and that it stays uncertain whether or not the precise to self-defence is relevant within the current case. The writer’s evaluation highlights uncertainties relating to the brink for self-defense, the attribution of assaults to non-state actors, the excellence between assaults on navy and business vessels, and the absence of specific consent from Yemen, placing into query the authorized justification offered by the US and UK. Learn the total submit right here.
Dejen Messele explores Ethiopia’s potential recognition of Somaliland, analyzing how modifications in authorized identities information the decision-making means of States in worldwide regulation. Messele discusses the current Memorandum of Understanding between Ethiopia and Somaliland which Somalia’s strongly opposs and its authorized implications. Moreover, the writer notes Ethiopia’s historic evolution from prioritizing territorial integrity to emphasizing ethnic self-determination, suggesting that this shift could clarify its assist for Somaliland’s recognition regardless of Somalia’s objections. Learn the total submit right here.
All current Occasions and Bulletins could be discovered right here.
The European Journal of Worldwide Regulation has new superior articles and superior critiques obtainable to learn on-line.
